A new study by Consumer Reports revealed that Uber and Lyft can show significantly different prices to different users even for ride requests made at the same time for the same trip.
The published results indicate that both apps use AI-powered systems to charge customers varying amounts. The review has reignited questions about whether prices can be explained solely by supply and demand conditions.
Same route, same minute, different prices
Consumer Reports created virtual ride requests for 30 routes across the U.S. The organization also deployed volunteers in Portland, Oregon, to request rides simultaneously.
Another test was conducted around Phoenix, where after accounting for discounts on Uber, prices ranged from $41.21 to $56.96, showing about a 38% difference.
In the Portland trial, 18 volunteers requested the same ride within the same minute, and prices again varied. On a route in Kansas City, Missouri, 29 different prices appeared for the same ride across 55 potential customers.
Companies' defense and objections
Uber and Lyft state that pricing varies based on factors like supply and demand. Uber argued that the service operates in an open and dynamic market, with prices depending not only on the destination but also on the time of request and surrounding conditions.
An Uber spokesperson said that prices change from second to second, making fee comparisons difficult. Lyft added that it does not segment customers into specific groups, and Uber confirmed it does not consider protected characteristics such as gender or disability.
The companies also suggested that Consumer Reports' tests might have artificially increased demand. Uber and Lyft did not respond to Business Insider's request for further comment.
Discount display also sparked debate
The study found that about half of the rides showed prices that appeared discounted. These screens displayed a higher price crossed out with a lower amount shown instead.
Consumer Reports reported that approximately 11% of these discounts seemed based on inflated initial prices. Uber and Lyft said the crossed-out amounts were not actual discounts but comparisons to past prices.
Derek Kravitz, the investigative reporter who authored the study, argued that a reasonable consumer would interpret these as discounts. The study has reignited the debate over price transparency in ride-sharing apps.