- BIST10012,151-0.94%
- USD49.220.00%
- EUR55.21+0.28%
- GOLD4,194.50-0.52%
- INTEREST37.00%-1.00
- BITCOIN82,961-0.85%
- October 13, 202619°
- BIST10012,151-0.94%
- USD49.220.00%
- EUR55.21+0.28%
- GOLD4,194.50-0.52%
- INTEREST37.00%-1.00
- BITCOIN82,961-0.85%
- October 13, 202619°
Precedent Decision from the Supreme Court for Tenants: Natural Wear and Tear is the Landlord's Responsibility
The Supreme Court ruled that ordinary wear and tear resulting from the natural use of the house belongs to the landlord, not the tenant. Tenants are not responsible for painting or...
The Supreme Court decided that tenants cannot be held responsible for ordinary wear and tear resulting from the natural use of the house, provided they do not cause intentional damage. Accordingly, situations such as fading of wall paint over time, minor scratches, or natural wear on parquet floors will be the responsibility of the landlord, not the tenant. This decision clarifies that tenants are not required to have painting or repairs done when moving out. This precedent decision by the Supreme Court's 3rd Civil Chamber contributes to clarifying the responsibilities between tenants and landlords. Tenants will not bear additional expenses due to natural wear and tear arising from proper use according to the contract.
Stay Updated with The Turkiye Times
Subscribe to be informed about special news, developments and announcements. We will keep you informed.
By signing up, you agree to our Privacy Policy
